The Intel Core Ultra 9 and Core i9 series are top choices for high-performance computing. But which one is better? This article will look at the main differences between these two processors. It will help you decide which one is right for you.
Are you thinking about upgrading your system? Wondering if the Intel Core Ultra 9 or the Core i9 series is better? This detailed comparison will cover architectural differences, performance benchmarks, and real-world use. It will show you which CPU is the clear winner.
Contents
- 1 Understanding the Key Differences Between Ultra 9 and i9
- 2 Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
- 3 Is Intel Ultra 9 Better Than i9: Benchmark Analysis
- 4 Gaming Performance and Frame Rates
- 5 Content Creation and Professional Workloads
- 6 Conclusion
- 7 FAQ
- 7.1 What are the key differences between the Intel Ultra 9 and Core i9 processors?
- 7.2 How do the core and thread configurations compare between the Ultra 9 and i9 processors?
- 7.3 What are the differences in terms of power consumption and thermal performance?
- 7.4 How do the Ultra 9 and i9 processors perform in single-core and multi-core benchmarks?
- 7.5 How do the Ultra 9 and i9 processors compare in gaming performance?
- 7.6 How do the Ultra 9 and i9 processors compare in content creation and professional workloads?
- 7.7 Which processor should I choose between the Intel Ultra 9 and Core i9 series?
Key Takeaways
- The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is for mobile platforms, while the Core i9-14900K is for desktops.
- The i9-14900K has higher base and turbo frequencies, more cores, threads, and a bigger cache than the Ultra 9 185H.
- The Ultra 9 185H uses less power and runs cooler, making it more energy-efficient.
- Benchmark results show the i9-14900K beats the Ultra 9 185H in single-core and multi-core performance.
- The Ultra 9 185H’s integrated graphics perform better than the i9-14900K, which doesn’t have integrated graphics.
Understanding the Key Differences Between Ultra 9 and i9
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and the Intel Core i9-14900K are top-notch desktop processors from Intel. They have different designs and architectures. These differences affect their performance and what they can do.
Architecture and Design Evolution
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses Intel’s latest 4th generation tech. It has a hybrid design with both performance and efficiency cores. The Intel Core i9-14900K also has a hybrid design but with a different setup.
Core and Thread Configuration
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 cores, with 8 for performance and 16 for efficiency. This makes it have 24 threads. The Intel Core i9-14900K has 16 cores (8 for performance, 8 for efficiency) and 32 threads. It has more cores and threads than the Ultra 9.
Cache and Memory Support
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a 24MB Intel Smart Cache. The Intel Core i9-14900K has a 36MB cache. The Ultra 9 supports the latest LPDDR5/x and DDR5 memory. The i9-14900K works with DDR5-5600 and DDR4-3200 memory.
The differences in architecture and design between the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and the Intel Core i9-14900K are big. They affect how well these processors work in tasks like gaming, content creation, and professional apps. Knowing these differences helps users pick the best processor for their needs.
Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
The world of powerful processors is growing, and so is the need for energy efficiency and cooling. The Intel Ultra 9 185H and the i9-14900K show clear differences in these areas.
The Ultra 9 185H is made for mobile devices, with a base power of 45W and a max turbo power of 115W. It has a TDP of 45W and can operate up to 110°C. In contrast, the i9-14900K has a base power of 125W and a max turbo power of 253W. It also has a TDP of 125W but can only go up to 100°C.
The Intel Ultra 9 185H is a top performer in terms of power efficiency. Its hybrid architecture makes it perfect for mobile devices. The i9-14900K, however, needs better cooling, especially when overclocked, to stay cool and perform well.
| Specification | Intel Ultra 9 185H | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Base Power | 45W | 125W |
| Max Turbo Power | 115W | 253W |
| TDP | 45W | 125W |
| Max Operating Temperature | 110°C | 100°C |
The Intel Ultra 9 185H is a cool performer, running 13.8% cooler than other Intel CPUs. It also cuts down system power by 17% compared to the i9-14900K at default settings. This makes the Ultra 9 185H great for those who want both power and energy efficiency.
Is Intel Ultra 9 Better Than i9: Benchmark Analysis
The debate between Intel’s Ultra 9 and i9 series is a big deal for tech fans. We’ve done a lot of benchmark testing to see which one is better. This helps us understand the real performance differences.
Single-Core Performance Results
The Intel Core i9-14900K beats the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H in single-core tasks. It has a faster base clock speed and can turbo up to 6 GHz. This makes it great for tasks like office work and simple content creation.
Multi-Core Processing Capabilities
But, the Ultra 9 185H is better in multi-core tasks. It has fewer cores and threads than the i9-14900K. Yet, it still performs well in tasks that need lots of threads, like video editing.
Real-World Application Testing
In real-world tests, each processor shows its strengths and weaknesses. The i9-14900K is a beast in demanding software like Adobe Premiere Pro. On the other hand, the Ultra 9 185H is perfect for everyday tasks like photo editing and office work.
So, the choice between the Intel Ultra 9 and i9 depends on what you need. The Ultra 9 185H is great for mobile devices because it’s powerful yet efficient. The i9-14900K is best for desktops and professional content creators because of its raw power.
Gaming Performance and Frame Rates
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and the Intel Core i9-14900K are neck and neck in gaming. The i9-14900K has a slight edge in some games. But the Ultra 9 285K keeps up and even beats it in some cases.
In Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the i9-14900K leads by up to 7 frames per second (fps) at different resolutions. But in Cyberpunk 2077, the i9-14900K has a bigger lead. It offers a 15 fps advantage at 1080p and 17 fps at 1440p.
In Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord, the Ultra 9 285K surprises by beating the i9-14900K by up to 30 fps at 1440p. This shows that different CPUs can shine in different games.
At higher resolutions, the difference between the two CPUs narrows. The GPU becomes more important for frame rates. This means that for 4K or ultrawide gaming, other factors like power efficiency and cost might matter more than CPU performance.
| Game | Resolution | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1080p | 97 fps | 104 fps |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1440p | 83 fps | 90 fps |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1080p | 78 fps | 93 fps |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1440p | 66 fps | 83 fps |
| Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord | 1440p | 134 fps | 104 fps |
The gap between the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and the Intel Core i9-14900K might change as games evolve. Gamers should think about their needs, budget, and future plans when picking between these CPUs for their ultra 9 vs i9 gaming setup.
Content Creation and Professional Workloads
The Intel Core i9-14900K and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K are top choices for content creation and professional tasks. The i9-14900K shines in video editing and 3D rendering. On the other hand, the Ultra 9 285K excels in productivity software and AI tasks.
Video Editing Performance
The i9-14900K leads in video editing thanks to its high core count and clock speeds. It has 24 cores and 32 threads, making it great for complex video editing. This allows it to render projects faster than the Ultra 9 285K’s 16 cores and 22 threads.
3D Rendering Capabilities
In 3D rendering, the i9-14900K is the clear winner. It shows an 11% performance boost over the Ultra 9 285K in Blender rendering. Plus, it uses 62 watts less power.
Productivity Software Performance
But, in productivity software, the difference between the two CPUs is smaller. The Ultra 9 285K beats the i9-14900K by 1.7% in Cinebench R23 single-core tests. It also outperforms by 11.8% in multi-core tests, showing its strong points in these areas.
The Ultra 9 285K also shines in AI tasks, improving by 18% in Geekbench 6’s machine learning benchmark. This highlights its skill in AI workloads.
Choosing between the Intel Core i9-14900K and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K depends on your specific needs. Both CPUs are high performers, but they have different strengths and trade-offs to consider.
Conclusion
The Intel Core Ultra 9 and Core i9 series meet different needs. The Ultra 9 is great for mobile workstations and laptops. It’s efficient and balances performance well.
It has big improvements in power use and cooling. It also does well in many tasks.
The Core i9 series, like the 14900K, is best for desktops needing lots of power. They’re top for gaming and tough work tasks. They offer unmatched performance.
Choosing between the Ultra 9 and i9 depends on what you need. If you want efficiency and can move around, the Ultra 9 is good. For the most power in a desktop, the i9 is better.
Knowing the differences in design, power use, and how they perform helps. This way, you can pick what fits your needs and likes best.
